雅思阅读真题(Part 2)
Part 2 · 考频:超高频 · 最近考试:2025.11.15
Some claim that it's the only way to save our planet from disaster. But is it really that simple?
完整文章请进入机考练习查看。
答案:E
原文定位:Garnett admits, though, that if this kind of approach were generally adopted, it would require a major adjustment in food preferences; people would have to get used to chicken, for example, with less fat
同义替换:「suggestion」↔「require」,「adapt to」↔「get used to」,「different quality of meat」↔「less fat」
答案:D
原文定位:For most of human history, livestock grazed on land that wasn't suitable for ploughing, and in doing so they converted inedible grass into edible meat and milk
同义替换:「the way animals were fed in the past」↔「For most of human history, livestock grazed on」
答案:H
原文定位:The United Nations 'best guess is that by 2050, the world will need to more than double its production of meat, an increase that would be environmentally disastrous
同义替换:「prediction」↔「best guess」
答案:F
原文定位:Another downside to a meat-free world would be the disappearance of animal by-products. Such a world would have to replace the 11 million tonnes of leather and 2 million tonnes of wool that come annually from livestock farming and which are turned into clothing
同义替换:「textile industries」↔「clothing」,「potential consequences」↔「disappearance」
答案:irrigation
原文定位:All agriculture damages the environment. Take for example the felled forests and the common use of irrigation systems
同义替换:「frequent」↔「common」,「modern farming」↔「agriculture」,「cutting down of trees」↔「felled forests」
答案:transport
原文定位:agriculture creates more greenhouse gases than all methods of transport put together
同义替换:「is responsible for」↔「creates」
答案:land
原文定位:Altogether, if we switched to a vegan diet,meaning no meat,dairy or eggs, the land currently required for crops would drop by an estimated 21 per cent
同义替换:「could be used for crops」↔「required for crops would drop」,「meat-free diet」↔「vegan diet」
答案:nitrogen
原文定位:One environmental impact that would also lessen through a reduction in animal farming would be that of the nitrogen emitted from agricultural processes, which spreads into both waterways and land
同义替换:「chemical pollution」↔「nitrogen emitted from agricultural processes」
答案:erosion
原文定位:in the US at least, livestock account for 55% of erosion, mostly from forests being cut down to make way for grazing land
同义替换:「caused」↔「account for」,「no information from other countries」↔「Global statistics are hard to come by」
答案:Annette Pinner
原文定位:Whilst there's no doubt that considerable reduction of meat consumption would have an environmental benefit, we do have to be careful about saying it would be the best solution if the whole world went vegetarian
同义替换:「not possible to say」↔「be careful about saying」,「vegetarian diet is right for everyone」↔「best solution if the whole world went vegetarian」
答案:Walter Falcon
原文定位:According to Walter Falcon;this means fewer free range cattle and sheep in green fields;If you're going to keep some livestock systems;I think the ones you'll want to keep are the intensive ones
同义替换:「economically preferable」↔「lowest environmental cost」,「farm animals in limited space」↔「intensive ones」
答案:Helmut Haberl
原文定位:It's difficult to switch to a “no- meat- but- milk diet”, says Helmut Haberl, a social ecologist
同义替换:「give up meat without giving up dairy products」↔「no-meat-but-milk diet」,「does not make sense」↔「difficult」
答案:Tara Garnett
原文定位:Tara Garnett;points out the usefulness of these animals. By giving them your leftovers, she says, they deal with your rubbish, and you get meat
同义替换:「Some animals can be fed」↔「subsist on leftovers」,「waste to be recycled」↔「deal with your rubbish」,「fed in a way that allows」↔「giving them your leftovers」