# The voynich manuscript

- 科目：雅思阅读真题（Part 3）
- 考频：超高频
- 最近考试：2025.4.5/2022.8.11/2017.12.9/2012.5.19/2009.6.27
- 题目数：14
- 来源页：https://www.yaquan.site/paper/8285004d-ef04-4ba2-b886-718cd8582dfb（在线机考练习与音频请访问该页面）
- 数据更新：2026-10-29

## 题目原文

A 
 The starkly modern Beinecke Library at Yale University is home to some of the most valuable books in the world: first folios of Shakespeare, Gutenberg Bibles and manuscripts from the early Middle Ages. Yet the library’s most controversial possession is an unprepossessing vellum manuscript about the size of a hardback book, containing 240-odd pages of drawings and text of unknown age and authorship. Catalogued as MS408, the manuscript would attract little attention were it not for the fact that the drawings hint at esoteric knowledge, while the text seems to be some sort of code – one that no-one has been able to break. It’s known to scholars as the Voynich manuscript, after the American book dealer Wilfrid Voynich, who bought the manuscript from a Jesuit college in Italy in 1912. 
 
 B 
 Over the years, the manuscript has attracted the attention of everyone from amateur dabblers to top codebreakers, all determined to succeed where countless others have failed. Academic research papers, books and websites are devoted to making sense of the contents of the manuscript, which are freely available to all. ‘Most other mysteries involve secondhand reports,’ says Dr Gordon Rugg of Keele University, a leading Voynich expert. But this is one that you can see for yourself. 
 
 C 
 It is certainly strange: page after page of drawings of weird plants, astrological symbolism and human figures, accompanied by a script that looks like some form of shorthand. What does it say and what are the drawings about? Voynich himself believed that the manuscript was the work of the 13th century English monk Roger Bacon, famed for his knowledge of alchemy, philosophy and science. In 1921 Voynich’s view that Bacon was the writer appeared to win support from the work of William Newbold, Professor of Philosophy at the University of Pennsylvania, who claimed to have found the key to the cipher system used by Bacon. According to Newbold, the manuscript proved that Bacon had access to a microscope centuries before they were supposedly first invented. They claim that this mediaeval monk had observed living cells created a sensation. It soon became clear, however, that Newbold had fallen victim to wishful thinking. Other scholars showed that his ‘decoding’ methods produced a host of possible interpretations. 
 
 D 
 The Voynich manuscript has continued to defy the efforts of world-class experts. In 1944, a team was assembled to tackle the mystery, led by William Friedman, the renowned American codebreaker. They began with the most basic code breaking task: analysing the relative frequencies of the characters making up the text, looking for signs of an underlying structure. Yet Friedman’s team soon found themselves in deep water. The precise size of the ‘alphabet’ of the Voynich manuscript was unclear: it’s possible to make out more than 70 distinct symbols among the 170,000-character text. Furthermore, Friedman discovered that some words and phrases appeared more often than expected in a standard language, casting doubt on claims that the manuscript concealed a real language, as encryption typically reduces word frequencies. 
 
 E 
 Friedman concluded that the most plausible resolution of this paradox was that ‘Voynichese’ is some sort of specially created artificial language, whose words are devised from concepts, rather than linguistics. So, could the Voynich manuscript be the earliest known example of an artificial language? Friedman’s hypothesis commands respect because of the lifetime of crypt analytical expertise he brought to bear,’ says Rob Churchill, co-author of the Voynich Manuscript, that still leaves a host of questions unanswered, however, such as the identity of the author and the meaning of the bizarre drawings. ‘It does little to advance our understanding of the manuscript as a whole,’ says Churchill. Even though Friedman was working more than 60 years ago, he suspected that major insights would come reality that the device that had already transformed code breaking: the computer. In this he was right – it is now the key tool for uncovering clues about the pleasure from manuscript’s language. 
 
 F 
 The insights so far have been perplexing. For example, in 2001 another leading Voynich scholar, Dr Gabriel Landin of Birmingham University in the UK, published the results of his study of the manuscript using a pattern-detecting method called spectral analysis. This revealed evidence that the manuscript contains genuine words, rather than random nonsense, consistent with the existence of some underlying natural language. Yet the following year, Voynich expert Ren Zandbergen of the European Space Agency in Darmstadt, Germany showed that the entropy of the text (a measure of the rate of transfer of information) was consistent with Friedman’s suspicions that an artificial language had been used. 
 
 G 
 Many are convinced that the Voynich manuscript isn’t a hoax. For how could a medieval hoaxer create so many telltale signs of a message from random nonsense? Yet even this has been challenged in new research by Rugg. Using a system, first published by the Italian mathematician Girolamo Cardano in 1150 in which a specially constructed grille issued to pick out symbols from a table, Rugg found he could rapidly generate text with many of the basic traits of the Voynich manuscript. Publishing his results in 2004 Rugg stresses that he hadn’t set out to prove the manuscript a hoax. ‘I simply demonstrated that it’s feasible to hoax something this complex in a few months, he says. Inevitably, others beg to differ. Some scholars, such as Zandbergen, still suspect the text has genuine meaning, though believe it may never be decipherable. Others, such as Churchill, have suggested that the sheer weirdness of the illustrations and text hint at an author who had lost touch with reality. 
 
 H 
 What is clear is that the book-sized manuscript kept under lock and key at Yale University has lost none of its fascination. ‘Many derive great intellectual pleasure from solving puzzles,’ says Rugg. The Voynich manuscript is as challenging a puzzle as anyone could ask for.

## 题目与答案

### 27. 27 It is uncertain when the Voynich manuscript was written.

27 It is uncertain when the Voynich manuscript was written.

- TRUE
- FALSE
- NOT GIVEN

**答案**：TRUE

原文定位：Yet the library’s most controversial possession is an unprepossessing vellum manuscript about the size of a hardback book, containing 240-odd pages of drawings and text of unknown age and authorship

同义替换：「uncertain」↔「unknown」

### 28. 28 Wilfrid Voynich donated the manuscript to the Beinecke Library.

28 Wilfrid Voynich donated the manuscript to the Beinecke Library.

- TRUE
- FALSE
- NOT GIVEN

**答案**：NOT GIVEN

原文定位：It’s known to scholars as the Voynich manuscript, after the American book dealer Wilfrid Voynich, who bought the manuscript from a Jesuit college in Italy in 1912

同义替换：「Wilfrid Voynich」↔「Wilfrid Voynich」

### 29. 29 Interest in the Voynich manuscript extends beyond that of academics and professional codebreakers.

29 Interest in the Voynich manuscript extends beyond that of academics and professional codebreakers.

- TRUE
- FALSE
- NOT GIVEN

**答案**：TRUE

原文定位：Over the years, the manuscript has attracted the attention of everyone from amateur dabblers to top codebreakers, all determined to succeed where countless others have failed

同义替换：「Interest in」↔「has attracted the attention of」；「extends beyond that of academics and professional codebreakers」↔「from amateur dabblers to top codebreakers」

### 30. 30 The text of the Voynich manuscript contains just under 70 symbols.

30 The text of the Voynich manuscript contains just under 70 symbols.

- TRUE
- FALSE
- NOT GIVEN

**答案**：FALSE

原文定位：The precise size of the ‘alphabet’ of the Voynich manuscript was unclear: it’s possible to make out more than 70 distinct symbols among the 170,000-character text

同义替换：「symbols」↔「distinct symbols」；「just under」↔「more than」

### 31. 31 The number of times that some words occur make it unlikely that the manuscript is based on an authentic language.

31 The number of times that some words occur make it unlikely that the manuscript is based on an authentic language.

- A Gordon Rugg
- B Roger Bacon
- C William Newbold
- D William Friedman
- E Rob Churchill
- F Gabriel Landini

**答案**：D William Friedman

原文定位：Furthermore, Friedman discovered that some words and phrases appeared more often than expected in a standard language, casting doubt on claims that the manuscript concealed a real language, as encryption typically reduces word frequencies;They began with the most basic code breaking task: analysing the relative frequencies of the characters making up the text;Yet Friedman’s team soon found themselves in deep water

同义替换：「some words occur」↔「some words and phrases appeared」；「an authentic language」↔「a real language」；「William Friedman」↔「Friedman」

### 32. 32 Unlike some other similar objects of fascination, people can gain direct access to the Voynich manuscript.

32 Unlike some other similar objects of fascination, people can gain direct access to the Voynich manuscript.

- A Gordon Rugg
- B Roger Bacon
- C William Newbold
- D William Friedman
- E Rob Churchill
- F Gabriel Landini

**答案**：A Gordon Rugg

原文定位：‘Most other mysteries involve secondhand reports,’ says Dr Gordon Rugg of Keele University, a leading Voynich expert. But this is one that you can see for yourself;Academic research papers, books and websites are devoted to making sense of the contents of the manuscript, which are freely available to all

同义替换：「other similar objects of fascination」↔「Most other mysteries」；「gain direct access to」↔「you can see for yourself」；「Gordon Rugg」↔「Gordon Rugg」

### 33. 33 The person who wrote the manuscript may not have been entirely sane.

33 The person who wrote the manuscript may not have been entirely sane.

- A Gordon Rugg
- B Roger Bacon
- C William Newbold
- D William Friedman
- E Rob Churchill
- F Gabriel Landini

**答案**：E Rob Churchill

原文定位：Others, such as Churchill, have suggested that the sheer weirdness of the illustrations and text hint at an author who had lost touch with reality

同义替换：「the person who wrote the manuscript」↔「author」；「may not have been entirely sane」↔「had lost touch with reality」；「Rob Churchill」↔「Churchill」

### 34. 34 It is likely that the author of the manuscript is the same person as suggested by Wilfrid Voynich.

34 It is likely that the author of the manuscript is the same person as suggested by Wilfrid Voynich.

- A Gordon Rugg
- B Roger Bacon
- C William Newbold
- D William Friedman
- E Rob Churchill
- F Gabriel Landini

**答案**：C William Newbold

原文定位：Voynich himself believed that the manuscript was the work of the 13th century English monk Roger Bacon;In 1921 Voynich’s view that Bacon was the writer appeared to win support from the work of William Newbold, Professor of Philosophy at the University of Pennsylvania, who claimed to have found the key to the cipher system used by Bacon

同义替换：「Wilfrid Voynich」↔「Voynich himself」；「It is likely that」↔「appeared to win support」；「William Newbold」↔「win support from the work of William Newbold」

### 35. Voynich Researchers 35 William Newbold believed that the author of the Voynich manuscript had been able to look at cells through a _____ , other researchers later demonstrated that there were flaws in his argument.

Voynich Researchers 35 William Newbold believed that the author of the Voynich manuscript had been able to look at cells through a _____ , other researchers later demonstrated that there were flaws in his argument.

**答案**：microscope

原文定位：According to Newbold, the manuscript proved that Bacon had access to a microscope centuries before they were supposedly first invented;They claim that this mediaeval monk had observed living cells created a sensation. It soon became clear, however, that Newbold had fallen victim to wishful thinking

同义替换：「William Newbold」↔「Newbold」；「through a」↔「access to a」

### 36. 36 William Friedman concluded that the manuscript was written in an artificial language that was based on _____ .

36 William Friedman concluded that the manuscript was written in an artificial language that was based on _____ .

**答案**：concepts

原文定位：Friedman concluded that the most plausible resolution of this paradox was that ‘Voynichese’ is some sort of specially created artificial language, whose words are devised from concepts, rather than linguistics

同义替换：「William Friedman」↔「Friedman」；「artificial language」↔「artificial language」；「based on」↔「devised from」

### 37. 37 He couldn’t find out the meaning of this language but he believed that the _____ would continue to bring advances in code breaking.

37 He couldn’t find out the meaning of this language but he believed that the _____ would continue to bring advances in code breaking.

**答案**：computer

原文定位：Even though Friedman was working more than 60 years ago, he suspected that major insights would come from the device that had already transformed code breaking: the computer

同义替换：「William Friedman」↔「Friedman」；「would continue to bring advances」↔「major insights would come from」

### 38. 38 Dr Gabriel Landini used a system known as _____ in his research, and claims to have demonstrated the presence of genuine words.

38 Dr Gabriel Landini used a system known as _____ in his research, and claims to have demonstrated the presence of genuine words.

**答案**：spectral analysis

原文定位：For example, in 2001 another leading Voynich scholar, Dr Gabriel Landin of Birmingham University in the UK, published the results of his study of the manuscript using a pattern-detecting method called spectral analysis

同义替换：「Gabriel Landini」↔「Gabriel Landin」；「system known as」↔「method called」

### 39. 39 Dr Gordon Rugg’s system involved a grille, that made it possible to quickly select symbols that appeared in a _____. Rugg’s conclusion was that the manuscript lacked genuine meaning.

39 Dr Gordon Rugg’s system involved a grille, that made it possible to quickly select symbols that appeared in a _____. Rugg’s conclusion was that the manuscript lacked genuine meaning.

**答案**：table

原文定位：Using a system, first published by the Italian mathematician Girolamo Cardano in 1150 in which a specially constructed grille issued to pick out symbols from a table, Rugg found he could rapidly generate text with many of the basic traits of the Voynich manuscript

同义替换：「Gordon Rugg」↔「Rugg」；「grille」↔「grille」；「quickly select symbols」↔「rapidly generate text」；「appeared in a」↔「from a table」

### 40. Questions 40 Choose the correct answer. Write the correct letter in box 40 on your answer sheet. 40 The writer`s main aim in this passage is to

Questions 40 Choose the correct answer. Write the correct letter in box 40 on your answer sheet. 40 The writer`s main aim in this passage is to

- A explain the meaning of the manuscript.
- B determine the true identify of the manuscript`s author.
- C describe the numerous attempts to decode the manuscript.
- D identify which research into the manuscript has had the most media coverage.

**答案**：C describe the numerous attempts to decode the manuscript.

原文定位：What is clear is that the book-sized manuscript kept under lock and key at Yale University has lost none of its fascination;The Voynich manuscript is as challenging a puzzle as anyone could ask for

---

以上内容由鸭圈雅思真题库（www.yaquan.site）提供，收录近期雅思考试真题回忆，支持在线机考模式免费练习。