雅思阅读真题(Part 3)
Part 3 · 考频:高频 · 最近考试:2021.8.7/2015.9.5
A
Americans today choose among more options in more parts of life than has ever been possible before. To an extent, the opportunity to choose enhances our lives. It is only logical to think that if some choices are good, more is better; people who care about having infinite options will benefit from them, and those who do not can always just ignore the 273 versions of cereal they have never tried. Yet recent research strongly suggests that, psychologically, this assumption is wrong, with 5% lower percentage announcing they are happy. Although some choices are undoubtedly better than none, more is not always better than less.
完整文章请进入机考练习查看。
答案:both “maximizers” and “satisficers”
原文定位:In particular, we composed a set of statements - the Maximization Scale - to diagnose people`s propensity to maximize. Then we had several thousand people rate themselves from 1 to 7 (from “completely disagree” to “completely agree”) on such statements as “I never settle for second best.” We also evaluated their sense of satisfaction with their decisions. We did not define a sharp cutoff to separate maximizers from satisficers, but in general, we think of individuals whose average scores are higher than 4 (the scale’s midpoint) as maxi- misers and those whose scores are lower than the midpoint as satisficers
答案:People have more tendency to experience regret
原文定位:Unfortunately, the more options you have and the more opportunity costs you incur, the more likely you are to experience regret
同义替换:「choices」↔「options」,「have more tendency to」↔「more likely you are to」
答案:higher-priced things would induce more regret if not used properly
原文定位:The reason for this, the investigators argued, was that the full-price payers would experience more regret if they did not use the tickets because not using the more costly tickets would constitute a bigger loss
同义替换:「higher-priced things」↔「more costly tickets」,「induce more regret if not used properly」↔「experience more regret if they did not use the tickets」
答案:limit the number of choices in certain situations
原文定位:To increase sense of happiness, we can decide to restrict our options when the decision is not crucial. For example, make a rule to visit no more than two stores when shopping for clothing
同义替换:「limit the number of choices」↔「restrict our options」,「in certain situations」↔「when the decision is not crucial」
答案:The influence of more choices
原文定位:Yet recent research strongly suggests that, psychologically, this assumption is wrong;Although some choices are undoubtedly better than none, more is not always better than less
答案:“satisficers”
原文定位:When satisficers find an item that meets their standards, they stop looking. But maximizers exert enormous effort reading labels, checking out consumer magazines and trying new products. They also spend more time comparing their purchasing decisions with those of others
同义替换:「making a decision」↔「decide what to buy」
答案:“maximizers”
原文定位:We also found that people with high regret sensitivity tend to be maximizers. Indeed, we think that worry over future regret is a major reason that individuals become maximizers
同义替换:「are likely to regret」↔「high regret sensitivity」
答案:neither “maximizers” nor “satisficers”
答案:FALSE
原文定位:To an extent, the opportunity to choose enhances our lives. It is only logical to think that if some choices are good, more is better;people who care about having infinite options will benefit from them, and those who do not can always just ignore the 273 versions of cereal they have never tried. Yet recent research strongly suggests that, psychologically, this assumption is wrong, with 5% lower percentage announcing they are happy
答案:NOT GIVEN
原文定位:We did not define a sharp cutoff to separate maximizers from satisficers, but in general, we think of individuals whose average scores are higher than 4 (the scale’s midpoint) as maximisers and those whose scores are lower than the midpoint as satisficers
答案:TRUE
原文定位:Early Decision Making Research by Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky showed that people respond much more strongly to losses than gains
同义替换:「tend to react more to」↔「respond much more strongly to」
答案:NOT GIVEN
答案:measure how people are likely to feel after making choices
原文定位:In particular, we composed a set of statements - the Maximization Scale - to diagnose people`s propensity to maximize. Then we had several thousand people rate themselves from 1 to 7 (from “completely disagree” to “completely agree”) on such statements as “I never settle for second best.” We also evaluated their sense of satisfaction with their decisions
同义替换:「measure how people are likely to feel after making choices」↔「evaluate satisfaction with decisions」