雅思阅读真题(Part 1)
Part 1 · 考频:中频 · 最近考试:2012.7.28
A
Economists accept that if people describe themselves as happy, then they are happy. However, psychologists differentiate between levels of happiness. The most immediate type involves a feeling; pleasure or joy. But sometimes happiness is a judgment that life is satisfying, and does not imply an emotional state. Esteemed psychologist Martin Seligman has spearheaded an effort to study the science of happiness. The bad news is that we’re not wired to be happy. The good news is that we can do something about it. Since its origins in a Leipzig laboratory 130 years ago, psychology has had little to say about goodness and contentment. Mostly psychologists have concerned themselves with weakness and misery. There are libraries full of theories about why we get sad, worried, and angry. It hasn’t been respectable science to study what happens when lives go well. Positive experiences, such as joy, kindness, altruism and heroism, have mainly been ignored. For every 100 psychology papers dealing with anxiety or depression, only one concerns a positive trait.
完整文章请进入机考练习查看。
答案:B
原文定位:Showing how easy it is to give people an intellectual boost, Isen divided doctors making a tricky diagnosis into three groups: one received candy, one read humanistic statements about medicine, one was a control group
答案:a catastrophic brain
原文定位:Because our brain evolved during a time of ice, flood and famine, we have a catastrophic brain. The way the brain works is looking for what’s wrong
同义替换:「survival」↔「evolved」,「forged our brains into the way of thinking for what’s wrong」↔「The way the brain works is looking for what’s wrong」
答案:landscapes or dolphins playing
原文定位:When subjects see landscapes or dolphins playing, part of the frontal lobe of the brain becomes active
同义替换:「are shown」↔「see」
答案:primitive parts
原文定位:But when they are shown unpleasant images a bird covered in oil, or a dead soldier with part of his face missing the response comes from more primitive parts of the brain
答案:The inner mechanism of human brains does not assist us to achieve durable happiness.
原文定位:Our difficulty, according to Daniel Nettle, is that the brain systems for liking and wanting are separate;At the same time, by a trick of nature, our brains are designed to crave but never really achieve lasting happiness
答案:A
原文定位:Since its origins in a Leipzig laboratory 130 years ago, psychology has had little to say about goodness and contentment. Mostly psychologists have concerned themselves with weakness and misery;For every 100 psychology papers dealing with anxiety or depression, only one concerns a positive trait
同义替换:「poorly researched psychology area」↔「has had little to say」
答案:F
原文定位:When subjects see landscapes or dolphins playing, part of the frontal lobe of the brain becomes active. But when they are shown unpleasant images a bird covered in oil, or a dead soldier with part of his face missing the response comes from more primitive parts of the brain
同义替换:「action」↔「response」,「positive」↔「pleasant」
答案:C
原文定位:Can you justify spending funds to research positive states when there are problems such as famine, flood and epidemic depression to be solved
同义替换:「skeptical attitude」↔「Can you justify」,「waste」↔「spending」
答案:G
原文定位:In humans, a drug like nicotine produces much craving but little pleasure
同义替换:「a substance」↔「a drug like nicotine」,「wanting」↔「craving」,「liking」↔「pleasure」
答案:H
原文定位:At the same time, by a trick of nature, our brains are designed to crave but never really achieve lasting happiness
同义替换:「hardly obtained」↔「never really achieve」,「the nature of brains」↔「our brains are designed」
答案:E
原文定位:Of the six universal emotions, four anger, fear, disgust and sadness are negative and only one, joy, is positive
同义替换:「human emotional categories」↔「six universal emotions」
答案:candy
原文定位:Isen divided doctors making a tricky diagnosis into three groups: one received candy, one read humanistic statements about medicine, one was a control group
同义替换:「medicine」↔「drugs」
答案:definition
原文定位:What is the point of defining levels of haziness and classifying the virtues? Aren’t these concepts vague and impossible to pin down