雅思阅读真题(Part 2)
Part 2 · 考频:中频 · 最近考试:2026.2.12深圳赛格BC雅思
A
As this book is about ways of measuring the carbon footprint of particular things, I should start by making it clear what I mean. I am using the word ‘carbon’ as shorthand for all the different global-warming greenhouse gases, and I am using the word ‘footprint’ as a metaphor for the total impact that something has. So I am using the phrase ‘carbon footprint’ as shorthand to mean the full climate-change impact of something. That something could be anything – an activity, an item, a lifestyle, a company, a country, or even the whole world.
完整文章请进入机考练习查看。
答案:E
原文定位:Input-output analysis’ key ‘trick’ is a piece of ingenious maths (for which a man called Wassily Leontief got a Nobel Prize) that succeeds in capturing the endless ripple effects in a way that is one hundred per cent complete
同义替换:「formula」↔「maths」
答案:B
原文定位:Measuring carbon footprints is a long way from being an exact process, whatever anyone claims;All my numbers are best estimates and nothing more
同义替换:「general shortcomings」↔「best estimates」,「calculations」↔「measuring」
答案:F
原文定位:The specific model I have used is one that was developed at Small World Consulting in collaboration with Lancaster University in the UK
同义替换:「working partnership」↔「in collaboration with」
答案:D
原文定位:It may sound simple, but it is not at all. It is back-breaking work, and since the number of processes you really need to include is always infinite, the job is never quite complete
同义替换:「demanding nature」↔「back-breaking work」
答案:G
原文定位:Putting the two methods together is sometimes called a hybrid approach, and the result is a bit like looking through both a microscope and a telescope at the same time. They each show you different things, and between them;you end up with a passable understanding of whatever it is you are looking at
同义替换:「combining」↔「putting the two methods together」,「advantage」↔「end up with a passable understanding」
答案:F
原文定位:A key weakness;is that it treats imported products as though they had the same carbon intensity as products from within the UK, whereas in reality they are usually more carbon-intensive
同义替换:「goods from home and abroad」↔「imported products」
答案:It is more complicated than it sounds.,It is a frequently used procedure.
原文定位:It may sound simple, but it is not at all;The first of these, process-based life-cycle analysis, is the most common approach to carbon footprint calculations
同义替换:「more complicated than it sounds」↔「simple, but it is not at all」,「frequently used procedure」↔「most common approach」
答案:It is comprehensive in scope.,It can use prices to get approximate carbon footprints.
原文定位:capturing the endless ripple effects in a way that is one hundred per cent complete;if you know how much something costs, you can get an instant crude estimate of its carbon footprint
同义替换:「comprehensive in scope」↔「one hundred per cent complete」,「use prices」↔「know how much something costs」,「approximate」↔「crude estimate of」
答案:government
原文定位:The specific model I have used;draws mainly on data obtained from government sources
同义替换:「provided」↔「obtained」
答案:weakness|||products
原文定位:it treats imported products as though they had the same carbon intensity as products from within the UK;A key weakness, which I sometimes adjust for, is that
同义替换:「significant」↔「key」,「products of different origin」↔「imported products」