雅思听力真题(Part 3)
Part 3 · 考频:中频 · 最近考试:2024.5.11/2018.10.13
答案:the price of houses compared to average income.
原文定位:Well, it looked at all houses, didn't it? New and old. So it started with average incomes across the whole workforce and then worked out house prices in relation to that, I mean, to what people were earning;So it's about affordability, what people pay in real terms. There's no information about the size of a house a typical family can buy
同义替换:「compared to average income」↔「in relation to average incomes across the whole workforce」,「measured the cost of houses」↔「worked out house prices」
答案:it compares prices in different cities.
原文定位:Yeah, there's lots of these surveys every year. Value is actually one of the newer ones, but it stands out because it gives figures for a range of the largest urban centers, which none of the others do
同义替换:「compares prices in different cities」↔「gives figures for a range of the largest urban centers」,「unusual」↔「stands out」
答案:the rules concerning land use.
原文定位:Okay, good point. Then one finding was that New Zealand houses are relatively expensive. Why is that? Because most of them are built of wood, and that's quite cheap;Yeah, it is. But the problem is there are too many regulations and restrictions about where you can build;So if more building sites were created for housing, the costs would come down;That's it, isn't it? Because there are plenty of contractors ready to do the work;Exactly
同义替换:「the rules concerning land use」↔「too many regulations and restrictions about where you can build」,「high」↔「relatively expensive」
答案:concerned there is no plan.
原文定位:Well, what about transport? I mean, it's all very well to talk about new housing, but how are people going to get there? Is the survey proposing new roads, new rail networks? It should be a coordinated approach;Yeah, but the survey didn't mention it. It's a missed opportunity because a commitment to funding public transport from the outset would improve air quality in our cities
同义替换:「plan」↔「a coordinated approach」
答案:indicate a future trend in house prices.
原文定位:Okay, then, the next survey, what can we expect? It'll look at all the same places, right;Exactly the same. But the next one will give an idea of the way prices are moving
同义替换:「indicate a future trend in house prices」↔「give an idea of the way prices are moving」
答案:period covered
原文定位:So there's the economist Andrew Coleman. He actually questioned whether the survey was money well spent because it only looked at a single year in isolation;A year when it was difficult to borrow money to buy a house, pushing up costs. So he thought the survey should consider a longer time frame
同义替换:「period covered」↔「only looked at a single year in isolation」
答案:way of defining home-buyers' wealth
原文定位:Did you get that article by Professor Messi? Because he's the leading authority on this topic;Yeah, interesting. He realized the method used to calculate how much money people had didn't take savings into account. So actually, people looking for a house were richer than the survey shows, making houses cheaper in real terms
同义替换:「way of defining home-buyers' wealth」↔「the method used to calculate how much money people had」
答案:old-fashioned systems of date analysis
原文定位:Then Richard Bernard, his criticism was original. He found out they were using quite outdated software to process all the information they gathered, which was crazy because they actually had the money available for an upgrade. So even though it was a highly regarded team of people, the way the statistics were interpreted was open to question
同义替换:「old-fashioned systems of date analysis」↔「outdated software to process all the information」
答案:organization of final text
原文定位:Okay, then Professor Lowndes. He thought the report was just badly written;That's right. After all the work that went into gathering valid information, the finished report was just too long and weakly structured, and there was too much unnecessary detail
同义替换:「final text」↔「the finished report」
答案:lack of public access to full information
原文定位:And the last one, Maria Darling. She made a point about the properties that were evaluated;There weren't enough of them, you mean;No, it wasn't that. But they were never identified for privacy reasons. But she thought the actual properties used should have been revealed, you know. The process should have been transparent if the people are going to have full confidence in the survey
同义替换:「lack of public access to」↔「were never identified」,「full information」↔「the actual properties used」