雅思阅读真题(Part 2)
大脑研究:我们为何无法掌控自己的思维
本篇也叫:大脑信任、Brains Trust、思维快与慢、习惯的力量、大脑如何运作、神经科学书籍
Part 2 · 最近考试:2026.10.17山东财经大学
本篇为雅思阅读真题(Part 2)《Brains trust》,共 13 题,2026.10.17山东财经大学雅思考试真题回忆,页面提供完整原文、题目、答案与解析,并支持在线机考模式免费练习。本页同时提供 Markdown 版本 供 AI 助手与搜索引擎直接读取。
文章综述了多本关于大脑与行为的畅销书,包括丹尼尔·卡尼曼的《思考,快与慢》提出系统1直觉与系统2逻辑两种思维模式,以及查尔斯·杜希格的《习惯的力量》主张通过改变行为而非意志力来养成新习惯,探讨了人类行为受神经机制和生物决定论影响的现象。
想在线练习这套卷子?进入机考练习
答案:G
原文定位:So do these books actually help us do what we think is right? We may feel as if we've learned something from discussions such as these but that feeling could well be an illusion itself
同义替换:「the relevance of all the books」↔「these books」
答案:C
原文定位:He believes that people can accomplish amazing things in life by turning round a losing team by teaching them not to think
同义替换:「reversing failure」↔「turning round a losing team」
答案:D
原文定位:What these writers are doing instead is looking at brain research, using the tools of our modern age - neurobiology, brain scans, retinal research - to prove that reflection plays a less important role in our lives than we ever realized
同义替换:「scientific and technological advances」↔「tools of our modern age‑‑neurobiology, brain scans, retinal research」,「study how the brain functions」↔「looking at brain research」
答案:A
原文定位:Books discussing how the brain works sit near the top of best‑seller lists around the world
同义替换:「popular」↔「best‑seller lists around the world」,「brain research」↔「Books discussing how the brain works」
答案:B
原文定位:Kahneman breaks down the way we process information into two modes of thinking: System 1 is intuitive, System 2 is logical
同义替换:「different ways」↔「two modes of thinking」,「brain functions」↔「the way we process information」
答案:F
原文定位:In his now‑classic and often cited essay, Habit, he argued that even most complex acts are reflexive
同义替换:「many other writers continue to make reference」↔「often cited」
答案:Charles Duhigg
原文定位:Another book, The Power of Habit, is more proactive. New York Times journalist Charles Duhigg's thesis is that we can't change our habits, we an only acquire new ones
同义替换:「People are unable to alter their routine behaviour」↔「we can't change our habits」,「but they can add different types of behaviour」↔「we can only acquire new ones」,「Charles Duhigg」↔「Charles Duhigg」
答案:Daniel Kahneman
原文定位:Kahneman breaks down the way we process information into two modes of thinking: System 1 is intuitive, System 2 is logical. System 1 operates automatically and quickly, with little or no effort and no sense of voluntary control. For example, we react to faces that we perceive as angry faster than to happy faces because they contain a greater possibility of danger
同义替换:「responses」↔「react」,「Quick」↔「faster」,「feels unsafe」↔「a greater possibility of danger」,「Daniel Kahneman」↔「Kahneman」
答案:William James
原文定位:If Hume seems modern, American psychologist and philosopher William James reads like a contemporary;Understanding why we act the way we do can free us from our bad habit
同义替换:「Self‑awareness」↔「Understanding why we act the way we do」,「making positive changes」↔「free us from our bad habit」,「William James」↔「William James」
答案:Daniel Kahneman
原文定位:Kahneman breaks down the way we process information into two modes of thinking;It makes decisions and normalizes irrational data either by organizing it to fit a made-up narrative or by disregarding it altogether
同义替换:「illogical information」↔「irrational data」,「ignore」↔「disregarding it altogether」,「Daniel Kahneman」↔「Kahneman」
答案:habit
原文定位:His major work, A Treatise of Human Nature, explored the ways in which habit rules our lives
同义替换:「David Hume's A Treatise of Human Nature」↔「A Treatise of Human Nature」,「examined」↔「explored」,「are controlled by」↔「rules our lives」
答案:perception
原文定位:Hume's experiments with perception, for example how we respond to colors, distance or numerical sets, prefigure the rigorous science of Professor Kahneman
同义替换:「studies」↔「experiments」,「people's reactions」↔「how we respond」,「such as colours」↔「for example how we respond to colors」,「investigation of」↔「experiments with」
答案:tools
原文定位:The 18th‑century philosopher David Hume didn't have these modern tools at his disposal, but he framed the question in much the same way
同义替换:「without」↔「didn't have」,「employed in scientific research today」↔「these modern tools」