雅思阅读真题(Part 3)
学习双语:OPOL策略与家庭语言环境
本篇也叫:双语家庭、OPOL、一人一语、双语育儿、日语-英语双语、家庭双语教育
Part 3 · 最近考试:2025.11.15
本篇为雅思阅读真题(Part 3)《Learning to be bilingual》,共 14 题,2025.11.15雅思考试真题回忆,页面提供完整原文、题目、答案与解析,并支持在线机考模式免费练习。本页同时提供 Markdown 版本 供 AI 助手与搜索引擎直接读取。
文章探讨了双语家庭中'一人一语'(OPOL)策略的实际效果。研究者Chisato Danjo调查了居住在英国、采用OPOL的日英跨国家庭,发现母亲会刻意创造更多日语交流时间,使日语与母子情感纽带产生关联,孩子也会用语言切换来表达情绪或反抗。研究挑战了'混用语言应避免'的传统观念。
Dr Chisato Danjo, Lecturer in Japanese and Linguistics, examines the bilingual family home
A
Few people would consider mastering more than one language a bad idea. Consequently, parents who speak different languages from each other are generally keen for their children to learn both. They understand that the family setting they create is central to this, and seek ways to ensure their children thrive bilingually. One of the best-known approaches is the 'one- parent-one-language' strategy (OPOL). Each parent uses their native language when communicating with their children, so the children learn both simultaneously. OPOL emphasises consistency - each parent sticking to one language - as key to its approach. But this creates the myth that mixing languages should always be avoided. My recent study, part of a new wave of multilingualism studies, would suggest that this received wisdom is just that: a myth. My research looked at Japanese-British families living in the UK with pre- and early school-age children who were following a more-or-less strict OPOL language policy. I was particularly interested in examining the impact of OPOL in the family home - how does this unique language environment affect the way children use languages?
B
Most of the Japanese mothers who participated were fluent in Japanese and English, while the fathers possessed merely an elementary grasp of Japanese. This made English the primary language of communication between the parents and outside the home. For this reason, the mothers were careful to carve out additional space for more sustained Japanese language learning with their children. In other words, this dedicated space for communicating in Japanese was time the children spent exclusively with their mother. This seemed to create a connection between 'Japanese language' and 'motherhood' in the children's perception. This link became apparent in the way the children used Japanese as a means of emotional bonding with their mother. In addition, they adopted a broader behavioural repertoire than that which is usually associated with a language. For example, switching to Japanese could sometimes serve as a method to appease Mum when she seemed unhappy. At other times, refusing to communicate in Japanese was a useful means of defiance, even when the dispute was not related to language.
C
The OPOL approach emphasises the need for parents to monitor children's language closely and correct them if they mix the two languages. In practice, many parents speaking the minority language are bilingual themselves - so they understand what their children are saying even when they do mix the two. In addition, parents feel it's problematic to keep correcting children when they mix languages. This is particularly the case when children show annoyance at being corrected. The parents believe it is a lot more important to have a meaningful conversation with their children.
D
But what if a child uses language that cannot readily be categorised as either one language or the other? An example from my study involved the use of English words adapted to accommodate Japanese pronunciation. One of these borrowed words, `ice cream', is usually pronounced 'aisukurimu'. The distinction between singular and plural does not exist in Japanese nouns in the English language sense, so whether using singular or plural, even in a borrowed word, `aisukurimu' is the form normally used. But one of my child participants showed his mother a drawing of two cones of ice cream and described them as 'aisukurimuzu', with a Japanese pronunciation but in English plural form. The child had created something in between.
E
Another example from my study focused on the interaction between Japanese-English bilingual siblings. In one case, a six-year-old girl was trying to convince her four-year-old brother to let her play with his toys. Following firm rejections by her brother, the girl drew on her communicative repertoire to convince him. To start with, she shifted from an authoritative demand to a softer and humbler appeal. She rephrased the question by using various polite forms. Then, her voice became more nasal, suggesting she was about to burst into tears. Even more interestingly, while the negotiation had begun in English, in the middle she shifted to Japanese. Although this may give the impression of language mixing, a considerably more complex process was taking place. The shift was accompanied by the incorporation of Japanese cultural elements, such as honorific titles that emphasise emotional attachment, a relationship of dependence between sister and brother, and an assumed obligation to care on the part of the brother. She succeeded.
F
These examples show how creatively and strategically human beings use language in their daily communication. Whether bilingual or not, we all constantly select from our repertoire anything that will best serve our purpose. For instance, imagine you want to ask a neighbour a favour. You would use polite language in a friendly voice. But what about your facial expression? Your body language? It is likely you would make appropriate choices. For bilinguals, shifting between languages is all part of their repertoire.
G
Our language repertoires are shaped by meaning, based on knowledge gathered throughout our lives, and the ways we use language also shape its meaning. The use of OPOL in the family brings specific meaning to language used at home, and children make full use of emergent meaning in their own interactions. The popularity of OPOL amongst parents rests on the simplicity of its message, which is that it should be applied consistently. But when we see a child actively using, adapting and negotiating their repertoire, it casts doubt on the belief that it's bad for children to mix languages. What they could actually be doing is demonstrating high-level flexibility and interpersonal skills.
H
Being bilingual isn't simply about an ability to speak two languages. Rigidly policing consistency in the OPOL approach could actually inhibit bilingual children's linguistic ability and creativity. And in the same way, it could also limit their parents' ability to reveal their own bilingual skills, using their own repertoires.
想在线练习这套卷子?进入机考练习
答案:They realise the importance of their role in their children's language learning.
原文定位:Consequently, parents who speak different languages from each other are generally keen for their children to learn both. They understand that the family setting they create is central to this, and seek ways to ensure their children thrive bilingually
同义替换:「parents speak different languages」↔「parents who speak different languages from each other」,「realise the importance of their role」↔「understand that the family setting they create is central to this」,「children's language learning」↔「children to learn both」
答案:one generally accepted principle of OPOL is incorrect.
原文定位:But this creates the myth that mixing languages should always be avoided. My recent study, part of a new wave of multilingualism studies, would suggest that this received wisdom is just that;a myth
同义替换:「received wisdom」↔「received wisdom」,「generally accepted principle」↔「the myth that mixing languages should always be avoided」,「incorrect」↔「myth」
答案:compensated for the fact that their children were exposed to more English than Japanese.
原文定位:Most of the Japanese mothers who participated were fluent in Japanese and English, while the fathers possessed merely an elementary grasp of Japanese. This made English the primary language of communication between the parents and outside the home. For this reason, the mothers were careful to carve out additional space for more sustained Japanese language learning with their children
同义替换:「mothers who took part in the writer's research」↔「the Japanese mothers who participated」,「compensated for」↔「were careful to carve out additional space」,「more English than Japanese」↔「English the primary language of communication」
答案:used language in a way that is uncommon.
原文定位:In addition, they adopted a broader behavioural repertoire than that which is usually associated with a language. For example, switching to Japanese could sometimes serve as a method to appease Mum when she seemed unhappy. At other times, refusing to communicate in Japanese was a useful means of defiance, even when the dispute was not related to language
同义替换:「used language」↔「adopted a broader behavioural repertoire」,「uncommon」↔「than that which is usually associated with a language」
答案:It is usually avoided if it causes bad feeling.
原文定位:In addition, parents feel it's problematic to keep correcting children when they mix languages. This is particularly the case when children show annoyance at being corrected. The parents believe it is a lot more important to have a meaningful conversation with their children
同义替换:「correcting children」↔「correcting children」,「causes bad feeling」↔「children show annoyance at being corrected」,「is usually avoided」↔「parents feel it's problematic to keep correcting」
答案:it may be difficult to distinguish which language a bilingual child is using.
原文定位:But what if a child uses language that cannot readily be categorised as either one language or the other;But one of my child participants showed his mother a drawing of two cones of ice cream and described them as 'aisukurimuzu', with a Japanese pronunciation but in English plural form. The child had created something in between
同义替换:「ice cream」↔「ice cream」,「may be difficult to distinguish」↔「cannot readily be categorised」,「which language a bilingual child is using」↔「as either one language or the other」
答案:refusal
原文定位:Following firm rejections by her brother, the girl drew on her communicative repertoire to convince
同义替换:「refusal」↔「rejections」,「brother」↔「brother」
答案:strategies
原文定位:Following firm rejections by her brother, the girl drew on her communicative repertoire to convince him
同义替换:「communication」↔「communicative」,「convince him」↔「change his mind」,「strategies」↔「repertoire」
答案:request
原文定位:To start with, she shifted from an authoritative demand to a softer and humbler appeal. She rephrased the question by using various polite forms. Then, her voice became more nasal, suggesting she was about to burst into tears
同义替换:「gentler, more polite language」↔「softer and humbler appeal」,「request」↔「question」,「pretended to be about to cry」↔「suggesting she was about to burst into tears」
答案:responsibility
原文定位:The shift was accompanied by the incorporation of Japanese cultural elements, such as honorific titles that emphasise emotional attachment, a relationship of dependence between sister and brother, and an assumed obligation to care on the part of the brother
同义替换:「exploited aspects of Japanese culture」↔「incorporation of Japanese cultural elements」,「responsibility」↔「obligation」
答案:YES
原文定位:Whether bilingual or not, we all constantly select from our repertoire anything that will best serve our purpose. For instance, imagine you want to ask a neighbour a favour. You would use polite language in a friendly voice;It is likely you would make appropriate choices
同义替换:「people who speak only one language」↔「Whether bilingual or not」,「adapt their way of communicating」↔「make appropriate choices」,「according to the situation」↔「best serve our purpose」
答案:NOT GIVEN
同义替换:「OPOL families」↔「」,「will go on to use this approach with their own children」↔「」
答案:NO
原文定位:The popularity of OPOL amongst parents rests on the simplicity of its message, which is that it should be applied consistently
同义替换:「OPOL approach is favoured by many parents」↔「The popularity of OPOL amongst parents」,「the reason」↔「rests on」,「it should be applied consistently」↔「applied consistently」
答案:NOT GIVEN
原文定位:But when we see a child actively using, adapting and negotiating their repertoire, it casts doubt on the belief that it's bad for children to mix languages. What they could actually be doing is demonstrating high‑level flexibility and interpersonal skills
同义替换:「mix languages」↔「mix languages」,「eventually develop a preference for one of the languages」↔「」